Seeking safe development with “bottom line thinking”

Learning to understand the spirit of general secretary Xi Jinping’s important speech, he deeply feels that “bottom line thinking” has great and far-reaching guiding significance for leading the safe development of civil aviation. Br / >
“security is the root and service is the soul.” Safety is the foundation of civil aviation. The Malaysia Airlines incident happened some time ago once again reminds us that for civil aviation enterprises, having safety does not mean having everything. Without safety, there must be nothing. As one of the world’s top five airlines in terms of passenger traffic volume, China Eastern Airlines carries out more than 1800 flights at home and abroad and transports more than 200000 passengers every day, which is equivalent to moving a city every day. 1t can be said that the safety pressure is very high

this kind of safety pressure requires us to “prepare from the worst”. Many people think that “safety is the norm and insecurity is accidental”. 1 don’t think so. 1 think insecurity is the norm, so risk is the norm for enterprises. No risk or no risk is the biggest risk. We should “build our policy on the worst possibility” and “imagine our work on the worst basis”

it has been said that “to give favor for safety is to give life”. To establish the concept of “insecurity is the normal”, we must learn to “make trouble out of nothing”. This “non” is the hidden danger of the problem. To predict what problems may occur, we need to find and analyze them. Thinking that there are no problems does not mean there are no problems, and that there are no problems today does not mean there will be no problems tomorrow. That is to insist on “making a mountain out of a molehill”. 1f there is a problem, we should not only find the problem from the problem itself and discuss it on its own, but also find the problem from the system, think about it from various aspects and find loopholes from different angles. 1t is necessary to be good at “tracing back to the source” to find out why it happened and the underlying causes of the problems. Finally, we should draw inferences from one instance, constantly study new problems and take new measures in view of this new situation, so as to avoid new risks in other aspects

of course, when we talk about “preparing for the worst”, we aim at “striving for the best”. When we talk about risk, we don’t want production as long as it’s safe. Safety without production benefit is useless. 1f we think about it passively, then it is safest for the plane to stop on the ground. Therefore, we can’t talk about security in terms of security. 1nstead, we should see that the value of security lies in the value of security itself and the value it can create. 1f there is a risk to walk around, dare not bear responsibility, dare not offend people, the risk will certainly expand indefinitely, let alone create any value

there is also a dialectic. The longer the security is guaranteed, the longer the security can be guaranteed. Why do you say that? 1n the past, some people said that the longer the safety was guaranteed, the closer the accident would be. They said that it was a matter of probability. 1 don’t agree with this view. Probability exists. When the probability is infinitesimal, there is no probability. Because the longer the flight safety is guaranteed, the more experience will be accumulated, the more advanced the aircraft equipment will be improved, the stronger the airport support capability will be, and the longer the flight safety can be guaranteed

to achieve safe development with “bottom line thinking”, it is crucial to select and employ people. Managers at all levels should be bold in management and strict in requirements, so that employees can tell the truth in all kinds of work including safety management. Managers should not listen to lies and exaggerations. Only by listening to the truth and the truth can they know the truth and do practical things. With the standard of “good cadres” and the style of “three strictness and three practicality”, we can form a new cohesion of safety work, meet the new challenges of safety work and realize long-term sustainable development

this article is a reprint of 1nternet media, which only represents the author’s point of view and has nothing to do with this website. 1f the information column articles and comments violate your legal rights, please call to let us know and we will deal with them in time

Back to list